nostril
NOS-tril
Old English
“A nostril is a nose-hole — and the Old English word for hole is also the ancestor of thrill. The same word that names the piercing of excitement once named the simple piercing of the nose.”
Old English nosthyrl is a compound of nosu (nose) and thyrel (hole, aperture, perforation). The thyrel element comes from Proto-Germanic *thurhilaz, from *thurh (through) — related to Old English thurh, the preposition, and Modern English 'through.' A thyrel was a hole through which something could pass — not a blank gap or cavity, but specifically an opening that connected one side to another, that permitted passage. The compound nosthyrl named the holes in the nose through which air passes — anatomically precise and entirely literal. The naming reflects the same transparent compound logic visible in elbow (forearm-bend), barn (barley-house), and window (wind-eye): Anglo-Saxon anatomical and architectural vocabulary built descriptive compounds by joining two familiar words, and then let time and everyday speech erode the transparency until the compound became a single opaque word that nobody unpacked anymore. Nosthyrl passed through nosethtirl, nosethirl, nostryle, and various other Middle English spellings before settling into the modern 'nostril' — which looks like a single unanalyzable word to anyone who has never met 'thirl.'
The thyrel element in nosthyrl is the same element that eventually produced the word 'thrill,' and this is not an obvious connection even once stated. Old English thyrlian meant 'to pierce, to perforate, to make a hole through something.' It was a physical, concrete verb: a sword thirled through armor, a nail thirled through wood, a cold wind thirled through inadequate clothing. The compound unthorlian appears in Old English meaning 'to bore through.' By Middle English, the verb thrilen or thirlen was in common use for any kind of piercing or boring, and the metaphorical extension from literal piercing to the sensation of sudden sharp feeling — the emotional 'piercing' of intense excitement, fear, or delight — began to emerge in the 14th and 15th centuries. By the 16th century 'thrill' was established for the sensation of being emotionally penetrated by an intense feeling, and by the 18th century it had settled into its modern sense of pleasurable excitement. The hole in the nose and the frisson of excitement share a single ancestor through the same root that named piercing and passing-through.
The second element of nostril, by the time Middle English was fully established, had become opaque. Thirl was no longer a productive independent word for 'hole' in everyday speech — it survived in some northern dialects into the early modern period, and it appears in technical geological language ('drill' is related) — but it had vanished from common currency. As a result, the compound nosthyrl underwent exactly the pressure that all opaque compounds face: once the second element stops being recognizable, the whole compound becomes a frozen form, subject to gradual sound-change without semantic stabilization. Medieval scribes produced nosethirl, nosethrel, nostryle, narestyrl, and other variants, groping toward a spelling that made auditory sense given the sounds they were hearing without any etymological anchor to guide them. The modern 'nostril' represents the form that won this competition, though the '-tril' is now entirely opaque — almost no English speaker would guess that it names a hole.
The nose itself is one of the oldest words in English and one of the most stable across the entire Indo-European language family: Proto-Indo-European *nas- produced Sanskrit nasa (nose), Latin nasus (nose, giving English 'nasal,' 'nares,' and the anatomical vocabulary of the face), and Old English nosu with minimal phonological change across thousands of years and thousands of miles of geographical separation. The nose-family is so ancient and so stable that it serves as one of the benchmark items in historical-comparative linguistics — the kind of basic body-part word that resists replacement and changes very slowly over millennia because everyone needs the word every day and has no reason to borrow or innovate. The hole in the nose got a compound name built from two entirely common Old English words, and then one of those words went obsolete, leaving the compound stranded without the internal scaffolding that had given it meaning. The nose stayed stable across all of English history. The hole-word died inside the compound. The compound solidified into an opaque unanalyzable form, and the word 'thrill' carried the thyrel root into a completely different emotional domain while 'nostril' preserved the same root in anatomical obscurity, the two derivatives so remote from each other that their shared ancestry requires a dictionary to demonstrate.
Related Words
Today
The word nostril is transparent in its first element — everyone hears 'nose' — and completely opaque in its second. The '-tril' sits in the word as an unexplained remnant, which is why many people, encountering the word analytically for the first time, find it slightly strange: why not just 'nose-hole'? The answer is that it was, once, exactly that — and then the hole-word died and took its transparency with it.
The thrill connection is genuinely surprising once heard, and not easily forgotten. The same Proto-Germanic root that produced the word for the sensation of being emotionally pierced also named the actual perforations in the human face. Language built both meanings from the same concept — piercing, passing-through, something penetrating — and then the two descendants traveled so far apart that they appear entirely unrelated. The nostril that thrills you with its etymological secret is doing exactly what the word's ancestor always named.
Explore more words